Sierra Club
Jump to
Search Ventana Chapter All Sierra Club
Ventana Chapter  
Explore, Enjoy and Protect the Planet  
Politics and Issues
Chapter Organization
Contact Us
National Sierra Club
California Sierra Club
Old Baldy, Canada | photo by Cameron Schaus

Sierra Club
   Conservation Issues of the Ventana Chapter | santa cruz county

Here’s a highway project the Sierra Club can support


Full span bridges needed over Waddell and Scotts Creeks

Scotts Creek bridge

The constricting structure of the Highway 1 bridge stretches across the Scotts Creek valley like a cinched belt forcing the creek to artificially stay within a narrow channel and separating the once-connected lagoon and estuary.

Photo by David Kossack


This aerial view of Scotts Creek in 2004 clearly shows the artificial
levees which were constructed in 1939 isolating fresh and estuarine marshes from the stream and lagoon. The marsh on the right was excavated to provide the fill.

Photo © 2004 Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman. All rights reserved

The need to replace North Coast bridges presents opportunity for
fish habitat restoration

by David Kossack

More than five years ago, Caltrans identified the bridges on Highway 1 at Waddell and Scotts Creeks as needing replacement. These bridges were built almost 70 years ago. In their present configuration these bridges and their approaches constrict their estuaries and associated coastal lagoons. Thus the bridges impede the natural creek processes of meanders, summer sand bar and lagoon formation, and estuarine complexity.

The result has been bad for the fish. The endangered tidewater goby has disappeared from Waddell Creek. Anadromous fish such as endangered coho salmon and threatened steelhead trout that migrate from the ocean up the creeks to reproduce, depend on coastal streams with healthy natural processes to survive.

The natural estuaries at the mouths of coastal creeks are important nurseries for young fish. The slow water habitat of the estuaries provides places for smolts to grow before they are mature enough to go out into the ocean. The estuaries also provide an opportunity for fish to adjust to salt water conditions before migrating out to sea. When bridge abutments are placed in the flood plain, as they are for the existing bridges at Waddell and Scotts Creeks, these critical estuaries are constricted. The creek is essentially channelized, producing fast water at times that scours out the channel and shoots the young fry into the ocean prematurely. Likewise, the constricted channel created by placing bridge abutments in the flood plain, interferes with the formation of summer sand bars and freshwater lagoons so necessary for the health and survival of juvenile salmonids.


Armoring rip-rap betrays the vulnerability of the Scotts Creek bridge with its footings in the flood plain. Full span bridges would reduce maintenance costs of protecting against storm surges and rising sea levels.

Photo David Kossack

The Waddell and Scotts Creek watersheds are habitat for Federally-listed endangered coho salmon, threatened steelhead trout, endangered California red-legged frogs and numerous other species native to the Santa Cruz Mountains. Despite their isolation from urbanization and the protection offered Waddell Creek by Big Basin Redwood State Park, anadromous fish populations in these watersheds have plunged to dangerously low levels.

More below....

Waddell Creek

In this 1972 photo, oxbow ponds to the left of Waddell Creek indicate previous meanders. These ponds are now filled with sand and sediment, part of the natural process. However, the bridge structures have prevented new meanders resulting in loss of estuarine complexity. Remains of the County bridge built at the beginning of the 20th Century can be seen upstream of the present bridge completed in 1941.

Photo © 2004 Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman. All rights reserved

The solution

Since both of these bridges have to be replaced anyway for structural reasons, they should be replaced by full-span bridges which would promote the restoration of these biologically-important watersheds and the fish that depend on them. Building structures in a flood plain is never a good idea. The existing bridges have been armored with rip rap in an attempt to protect their poor placement. To repeat this mistake that was made when the first bridges were built, by building replacement bridges with abutments in the flood plain, would be unthinkable. But that is what Caltrans is considering, despite the enactment of a law in 2005 that requires Caltrans to design stream crossings that do not present a barrier to anadromous fish passage.

At the present time Caltrans is narrowly interpreting “barriers to fish passage” simply as structures that prevent the movement of fish up or down stream. The damage to estuaries and coastal lagoons by bridge abutments in the flood plain are cumulative barriers to fish passage. This broader interpretation of the law (SB-857) recognizes the barriers to fish health and reproduction that the existing bridges pose.

Constructing full-span bridge replacements at Waddell and Scotts Creeks to address cumulative barriers to fish passage would provide a model that can be applied to other coastal estuaries suffering from poorly-designed bridges from the last century.

How to help

• Let Caltrans know you want the replacement bridges for Waddell and Scotts Creeks to be full-span structures that do not impinge on the flood plain.
• Tell Caltrans that you agree with American Rivers, NOAA, the Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, California Trout, and the Sierra Club that the health of endangered coho and tidewater goby, threatened steelhead and other listed species balance any extra cost of full-span bridges.
Caltrans address: Rich Krumholz, District Director, Caltrans District 5, 50 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, email: .
• Send a copy of your letter or email to David Kossack, P.O. Box 268, Davenport, CA 95017, email: .
For more information call David Kossack, 427-3733.


< back to all issues