Sierra Club
Ventana Chapter  
Explore, Enjoy and Protect the Planet  
Home
Home
Politics and Issues
Schedule
Chapter Organization
Join
Resources
Contact Us
National Sierra Club
California Sierra Club
Old Baldy, Canada | photo by Cameron Schaus

Sierra Club
Conservation Issues of the Ventana Chapter | santa cruz wide
EPA finally sets plans for mercury limits on cement kilns
Davenport plant one of biggest polluters
March 2008

Under intense pressure from states, environmental, and public health groups, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced plans to regulate mercury pollution from over 100 cement kilns across the country by September 2009. The announcement marks a dramatic shift in EPA policy which, until now, had been to resist requiring mercury controls for cement kilns.

Three times in the last 10 years, federal courts have ordered EPA to set emission standards to control cement kilns' mercury emissions. Until now, EPA has ignored these orders or sought to evade them. EPA finally indicated that it would set mercury emission standards in papers filed on February 20 in a fourth case brought by Earthjustice on behalf of Sierra Club and other environmental groups. The States of New York, Michigan, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Pennsylvania also filed suit.

Cement kilns pumped nearly 12,000 pounds of mercury into the air in 2006, according to EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI).However, the TRI depends on voluntary emissions estimates that may significantly understate kilns’ actual pollution levels. Individual cement kilns in New York, Michigan and Oregon routinely understated their emissions until being required by State officials to conduct emissions tests—at which point it was evident that their actual emissions were approximately ten times higher than previously reported.

“One of California’s biggest mercury polluters is a cement kiln in Davenport, California, just across the street from the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary,” said Kristen Raugust, a member of the Executive Committee of the Santa Cruz County Group of the Sierra Club.

According to a 1991 article in Science News, it only takes 1/70th of a teaspoon of mercury to contaminate a 25-acre lake. Over 40 states have warned their residents to avoid consuming various fish species due to mercury contamination; over half of those mercury advisories apply to all water bodies in the states.

Mercury is a dangerous neurotoxin that can impair a young child’s ability to walk, talk, read, write, and learn. While the mercury pollution from these kilns is staggering, they are also major emitters of toxic organic compounds, such as benzene and formaldehyde, known carcinogens. In the court documents, EPA also pledged to set emission standards for these pollutants as well.

It took 10 years

Sierra Club first filed suit in 1998, after EPA failed to meet a November 15, 1997 deadline to issue air toxics regulations for cement kilns. In that case, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered the agency to do so by May 15, 1999.

When the agency issued the overdue regulations however, it refused to include standards to control cement kilns’ mercury emissions. Sierra Club, represented by Earthjustice, challenged that decision in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which found in 2000 that the agency's refusal violated the federal Clean Air Act and ordered the agency to set mercury standards.

EPA ignored the D.C. Circuit's order until 2004, when Sierra Club brought a third suit, which resulted in an order requiring EPA to issue the required mercury standards no later than December 2006.

In 2006, the agency issued another rule refusing to set mercury standards. On this occasion, it was sued not only by local and national environmental groups, but also the nine states. That case was held in abeyance from 2006 until now, when EPA was forced to indicate whether it wished to set mercury standards or litigate the issue a fourth time. The agency indicated in a motion to the court that it expected to propose mercury standards by “mid-September 2008” and issue them by “mid-September 2009.”




< back to all issues