Sierra Club Ventana Chapterback issues
Explore, Enjoy and Protect the Planet  
Old Baldy, Canada | photo by Cameron Schaus

Sierra Club
Club appeals expansion of Davenport cement plant


Write the Costal Commission!  
Write the Coastal Commission!

 
RMC Pacific Materials in Davenport claims that production of an additional 105,000 tons of cement per year will cause no impact on our coastal resources. The Sierra Club is not so sure. RMC has presented no data to support their contention that this 12% increase in production will have no adverse consequences for the environment.

The RMC cement plant is located in an environmentally sensitive area, adjacent to the San Vicente Creek watershed and surrounded by Coast Dairies public land.

When the Santa Cruz County Supervisors approved the increased production in 2002, the Club appealed the decision to the Coastal Commission asking them to take jurisdiction. The Coastal Commission staff recommended that the Commission take jurisdiction at its January hearing.

However, at that meeting in Los Angeles, the Commission agreed to continue the appeal to a date as yet unscheduled, because RMC, through its attorney, stated that further information was still available in Santa Cruz County files, and that once the Commission reviewed this material, the Commission would agree that there was no need to take jurisdiction of the project. Although the Sierra Club does agree that review of pertinent information is advisable, the Club also does not wish to see this appeal get derailed through stalling.

RMC claims that its proposal for an increase in cement production is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review because it is an existing facility. However, the Existing Facilities exemption only applies if the facility is not expanding its existing use. In this case RMC is expanding its existing use by a significant amount, and the proposal should be subject to further environmental review under CEQA.

No water availability studies have been conducted on nearby San Vicente Creek for further withdrawal of water by RMC, even though this creek has been designated in the Santa Cruz County General Plan as a creek already used at full capacity, and has been determined by the California Department of Fish and Game as an endangered coho salmon spawning stream.

No study has been conducted to assess the cumulative, growth-inducing impact of all relevant RMC permits (there are other RMC permits in progress, including a quarry expansion permit and a permit to expand the plant by building a dome).

RMC is out of compliance with its base coastal permit, having never conducted a complete review of its cement plant operations, due in 1995.


How you can help

  • Watch for news about this expansion in the media. It is likely action will be taken before the next Ventana goes to press.
  • Write the Coastal Commission urging it to take jurisdiction of this project. California Coastal Commission, 725 Front Street, Suite 300, Santa Cruz, California 95060. Refer to Appeal A-3-SCO-02-088 in your letter.

[ top of page ]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]